Wish Definition von "Type" als Private

[Deleted member 103]

Hi,

Here again the request, it is really very important.
I accidentally found the error in my app.
I defined this variable in main module and in a library, so compilation was not possible.
All error messages had no indication of the variable.

Type Point (x As Int, y As Int)

 

[LucaMs]

Although having the possibility to define private a type can be useful, I did not understand your post (you've probably used the term variable instead of type).

I can have a type defined in a class of a library, like:

Type tPoint(x as int, y as int)

and the same in a project without "conflicts".

[beautiful, unuseful, almost empty library named Buttami2.jar with that type defined]

 

[Deleted member 103]

Although having the possibility to define private a type can be useful, I did not understand your post (you've probably used the term variable instead of type).

Yes you are right.

But this is about B4i and not B4a, and maybe that makes the difference.

 

[LucaMs]

Oops, I did not see that it was B4i

 

[Erel]

I'm sure that private types will be added at some point. Still, it is not recommended to create a type named Point. Add a two or three letter prefix (ex: FPPoint).

 

[LucaMs]

I think it is better "t" or "typ" as prefix, so you can have all your types listed consecutively in the (what is its name? ) "editor helper".

 

[Deleted member 103]

I'm sure that private types will be added at some point. Still, it is not recommended to create a type named Point. Add a two or three letter prefix (ex: FPPoint).

Thank you in advance.

 

[LucaMs]

I'm sure that private types will be added at some point. Still, it is not recommended to create a type named Point. Add a two or three letter prefix (ex: FPPoint).

Got it only now; you mean FP as Filippo