You're right but the "nice" aspect is that those apps have nothing in common between themI would suggest something which shows what the app actually does.
Like office toolbox or retro game collection or writing & drawing.
I really (strongly) think that we should "mix" more than one app in one, if we hope to gain from ads impressions (see the link I posted in #1)
if i want a image editor then i will look for that app and not for an image editor and a unit converter and a todo list
(apps of the same kind is much better) is that I HATE the commercial policy of the ad networks, it is unfair.I really (strongly) think that we should "mix" more than one app in one
I knew Smart Tools, very nice and usefulif you mix apps that are related to each other then this is a good way like this app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=kr.aboy.tools
I knew Smart Tools, very nice and useful
This is sure (if a SW house had developed my app two years ago it has already gained quite a lot, I think).try to make an app that you would download and that is really good.
appA obtains 25K impressions / day
appB obtains 25k impressions / day
you will earn X$ / day.
If you have one app only, which obtains 50K impressions / day, you will earn X$ * 3 or more.
It is so (I don't know hou much, if 1/3 -33$ - can be right, but the concept is that).so if 1 app with 10k impression makes 100$ then that doesnot mean that 10 apps with 1 k impression will make together 33$
I read it many times; just as example:who told you that. this is not true.
This has nothing to do with what I wroteAdvertisers have the right to choose when their ads will be displayed.
This has nothing to do with what I wrote
Have you read the post I linked here?Because you're wrong about impression.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?