Android Question B4X with AI Machine Learning

[Global Robot Empire]

@Erel , can we Crowdfund you to incorporate AI into B4X – with the help of some Experts, if needed?

Not the Language Models – more like Deep Machine Learning to do interesting things.

Train the AI – like Tensor with Deepfakes.

But on a lower level, using APIs maybe – without the need for Nvidia Chips.

 

[BlueVision]

Personally, I see no reason to use the so-called AI in B4X. Why?

- Are the current functions of so-called nowadays ‘AI’ creative?
- Is today's AI capable of independently developing previously non-existent programme solutions that actually work?
- Does today's AI also consider the consequences of its work like a human does?

3x no.

All attempts on my part to incorporate currently available AI into programmes have so far failed. The result has always been unusable code.
Today's AI is perhaps good enough to quickly extract the right solution from existing solutions at breathtaking speed. But it is not creative. It is always just a copy of existing solutions, apart from a few highlights.
Seen in this light, it is actually still far too early to even talk about AI. Today's AI is a clever and super-fast search engine. Nothing more and nothing less.

Of course this could change, but not in the foreseeable future.

Then we would no longer need the wonderful B4X programming environment. Then the AI would provide us with the finished programme and nobody would be interested in how the whole thing works and was implemented. And that would be a huge problem, if not downright dangerous in certain areas.

At the moment, ‘AI’ is a good start with apparently good marketing.

 

[Magma]

Ofcourse this thread is not belong to B4A Questions... but may be at chit-chat... however... i think AI can help as a good Search-Machine for B4X and may be for small routines creating pseudocode.

I am sure that Erel already making experiments "years" now...

Do not forget that Erel is always steps ahead...

 

[Global Robot Empire]

Personally, I see no reason to use the so-called AI in B4X. Why?

- Are the current functions of so-called nowadays ‘AI’ creative?
- Is today's AI capable of independently developing previously non-existent programme solutions that actually work?
- Does today's AI also consider the consequences of its work like a human does?

3x no.

All attempts on my part to incorporate currently available AI into programmes have so far failed. The result has always been unusable code.
Today's AI is perhaps good enough to quickly extract the right solution from existing solutions at breathtaking speed. But it is not creative. It is always just a copy of existing solutions, apart from a few highlights.
Seen in this light, it is actually still far too early to even talk about AI. Today's AI is a clever and super-fast search engine. Nothing more and nothing less.

Of course this could change, but not in the foreseeable future.

Then we would no longer need the wonderful B4X programming environment. Then the AI would provide us with the finished programme and nobody would be interested in how the whole thing works and was implemented. And that would be a huge problem, if not downright dangerous in certain areas.

At the moment, ‘AI’ is a good start with apparently good marketing.

You are right. Agree completely