Hello,Awesome. My question would be on offline and online sync functionality.
I am using couchdb for offline web apps which have a functionality to sync when online. Off course this is a a nosql approach, no possibility of running sql queries or joins as it's merely like key value pairs. However will an awesome rest api, they say it's like Mongo.
Also, the dB engine you will release will only work on vps environments and not shared hosting?
You forgot to mention PostgreSQL99% of the database engines are out-dated, and they rarely add new features, and top 2 database in the world (MS SQL and Oracle) cost millions per license.
This is a very tall claim. Storing a million rows in 500 kb!?!?!!!Our aim is to create a database engine that can be faster, easier, more secure than any database engine out there, imagine you have 1 million records stored on your hard disk or your server with a size of only 500KB and the select query would take 2-3 milliseconds, which database engine is able to do that?
The performance part is surprising as Oracle is the leader in RDBMS. I am saying this because we have a SaaS based web app for managing education institutions developed in PHP and which uses MySQL.I know a local manufacturer that pays 1.9 Million dollars per year for Oracle just because they use their database, and i could swear that the performance is slower than internet explorer
There will be 2 versions, a Free version and a cloud versionHow much is this going to be ?
What server specs are required to run this ?
Is it going to run on Linux servers (non-ui app) or only plan to release a desktop version ?
And a cloud version (Web App)Hello,
2- It can work on windows server, VPS, or a free hosting (apache) for example 000webhost
That's two fascinating claims you made there, without providing any actual facts for neither. I'm going to assume you're not really talking about discontinued database solutions but rather something like to top twenty ones? So at least 19 of them are outdated? I realize it's difficult to have deep knowledge on all databases, but what would you say are the most common ways they are outdated?99% of the database engines are out-dated, and they rarely add new features
Top 2 by what criteria? Price? According to the list i link below, which is sorted by popularity and seem very updated (Wikipedia also references it, so I'm going to assume it's a respected site), we have MySQL on spot #2, well above MS SQL. MySQL was bought by Oracle a couple of years ago, which caused the original developers to fork it into MariaDB, which still is free. And is on place 12 on the list. Just to take an example of a popular database that is free. And let's not forget about PostgreSQL which many consider an absolute piece of art when it comes to databases.top 2 database in the world (MS SQL and Oracle) cost millions per license.
That's an ambitious goal and I really look forward to seeing your database on their site. Don't forget to register here so we can see how your database compares to the other 381 systems currently ranked: https://db-engines.com/en/user_loginOur aim is to create a database engine that can be faster, easier, more secure than any database engine out there, imagine you have 1 million records stored on your hard disk or your server with a size of only 500KB and the select query would take 2-3 milliseconds, which database engine is able to do that?
Will do.That's an ambitious goal and I really look forward to seeing your database on their site. Don't forget to register here so we can see how your database compares to the other 381 systems currently ranked: https://db-engines.com/en/user_login
do not blaspheme!which makes you stand closer to Erel (in my humble opinion).
I don't want this thread to turn into database comparison or a sword fight, below are latest releases from the site you provided :That's two fascinating claims you made there, without providing any actual facts for neither. I'm going to assume you're not really talking about discontinued database solutions but rather something like to top twenty ones? So at least 19 of them are outdated? I realize it's difficult to have deep knowledge on all databases, but what would you say are the most common ways they are outdated?
And you say they rarely add new features. Looking at Oracle, MySQL, MS SQL and PostgreSQL, they've been around for 25-40 years and could on many aspects be considered feature complete. Is it a bad thing? Do you think they should keep on adding features regardless what, just so they can't be criticized on forums?
Top 2 by what criteria? Price? According to the list i link below, which is sorted by popularity and seem very updated (Wikipedia also references it, so I'm going to assume it's a respected site), we have MySQL on spot #2, well above MS SQL. MySQL was bought by Oracle a couple of years ago, which caused the original developers to fork it into MariaDB, which still is free. And is on place 12 on the list. Just to take an example of a popular database that is free. And let's not forget about PostgreSQL which many consider an absolute piece of art when it comes to databases.
If i combine my team, myself included, another 50,000 developers, 9 companies, a wizard, a goddo not blaspheme!
We developed our own compression method, been tested and it didn't even take 2% of the CPU and it's been tested on Core i3 which means the CPU was very slow.which will inevitably take cpu time
That's amazing! You must have come up with those numbers by doing internal testing. Would it be possible for you to provide one of the tables with 10 millions of rows that you can compress to less than 500KB? Perhaps as a CSV? I'd love to see it.8- 10 Millions of tables and rows and the database result will result in less than 500KB file.
You mention it so casually, but it's very likely that this is an even bigger achievement than your database. You should consider describing it in a document and send to scientific journals, which likely would make you famous. Or at the very least package it as its own product and license it other companies - you should be able to make a lot of money that way.We developed our own compression method, been tested and it didn't even take 2% of the CPU and it's been tested on Core i3 which means the CPU was very slow.
Not really, it's been taught for ages, start from here, study it, understand it and you will manage to create your own method :You mention it so casually, but it's very likely that this is an even bigger achievement than your database. You should consider describing it in a document and send to scientific journals, which likely would make you famous. Or at the very least package it as its own product and license it other companies - you should be able to make a lot of money that way.
Half byte per row. What is each row made of... air?1.000.000 row, in 500.000 byte db
That's funny, because I thought you developed your own method. Instead it seems you implemented something that has been taught for ages.Not really, it's been taught for ages, start from here, study it, understand it and you will manage to create your own method :
Did you read it? literally the first line :That's funny, because I thought you developed your own method. Instead it seems you implemented something that has been taught for ages.
It's not a CSV.You forgot to mention the CSV, please remember to share it. Surely you have your testfiles available somewhere nearby. I'm really super interested in seeing how you compress 10 millions of rows into less than 500 000 bytes using your implementation of Huffman coding.
Bits.Half byte per row. What is each row made of... air?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?