MitchBu Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Aug 30, 2019 #1 I just tried to put breakpoints in my code on an empty line, and they did not work. Then I added a log() on the line where the breakpoint was, and it worked. Apparently, for a breakpoint to halt execution, it has to be set on a line where there is an instruction. Is this intended ?
I just tried to put breakpoints in my code on an empty line, and they did not work. Then I added a log() on the line where the breakpoint was, and it worked. Apparently, for a breakpoint to halt execution, it has to be set on a line where there is an instruction. Is this intended ?
alwaysbusy Expert Licensed User Longtime User Aug 30, 2019 #3 My guess is when the B4X code is transpiled to java, empty lines (and commented lines too?) do not have a link between the two languages. Upvote 0
My guess is when the B4X code is transpiled to java, empty lines (and commented lines too?) do not have a link between the two languages.
MitchBu Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Aug 30, 2019 #4 alwaysbusy said: My guess is when the B4X code is transpiled to java, empty lines (and commented lines too?) do not have a link between the two languages. Click to expand... Hi Alain, Indeed a breakpoint on a commented line does not halt execution as well. As long as I know it is normal, that's fine. Thank you Upvote 0
alwaysbusy said: My guess is when the B4X code is transpiled to java, empty lines (and commented lines too?) do not have a link between the two languages. Click to expand... Hi Alain, Indeed a breakpoint on a commented line does not halt execution as well. As long as I know it is normal, that's fine. Thank you