Theera Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Saturday at 11:16 AM #1 Is there way changing =< and => to be ≤ and ≥ while typing Automatically. Unicode ≤ = U+2264 ≥ = U+2265
Is there way changing =< and => to be ≤ and ≥ while typing Automatically. Unicode ≤ = U+2264 ≥ = U+2265
E emexes Expert Licensed User Saturday at 12:12 PM #2 You can almost do it with the old VT220 Compose key, and there is a windows program that implements that on Windows. Most word processors can do what want, via auto-correct or sequence-replace.
You can almost do it with the old VT220 Compose key, and there is a windows program that implements that on Windows. Most word processors can do what want, via auto-correct or sequence-replace.
E emexes Expert Licensed User Saturday at 12:27 PM #3 http://wincompose.info but it won't do it automatically, you have to hit the "compose" key first, before typing the <= or >=
http://wincompose.info but it won't do it automatically, you have to hit the "compose" key first, before typing the <= or >=
Theera Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Saturday at 1:06 PM #4 Thank you for the good advice. Will it affect the compiler of B4x products?
Daestrum Expert Licensed User Longtime User Saturday at 2:46 PM #5 Probably yes, as ≤ is not valid in B4X B4X: If a ≤ b Then Log("Oops") End If produces Main - 14: Input string was not in a correct format.
Probably yes, as ≤ is not valid in B4X B4X: If a ≤ b Then Log("Oops") End If produces Main - 14: Input string was not in a correct format.
Alessandro71 Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Saturday at 2:56 PM #6 this does not look like a good idea...
Theera Well-Known Member Licensed User Longtime User Sunday at 12:56 AM #7 Daestrum said: Probably yes, as ≤ is not valid in B4X B4X: If a ≤ b Then Log("Oops") End If produces Main - 14: Input string was not in a correct format. Click to expand... it looks awesome for coding.
Daestrum said: Probably yes, as ≤ is not valid in B4X B4X: If a ≤ b Then Log("Oops") End If produces Main - 14: Input string was not in a correct format. Click to expand... it looks awesome for coding.
E emexes Expert Licensed User Sunday at 1:10 AM #8 Alessandro71 said: this does not look like a good idea... Click to expand... On the bright side, eliminates dilemma of whether to use => or >=
Alessandro71 said: this does not look like a good idea... Click to expand... On the bright side, eliminates dilemma of whether to use => or >=