B4R Question Couldn't find a place to say thank you.

Thank you for the feedback

The fact that you prefer v1.00 of B4R over other alternatives says something about the potential of B4R.

Developers can help promote B4X and specifically B4R by spreading the word about the tools.

I'm pretty sure that most Arduino developers will find it easier to develop with B4R compared to Arduino IDE with C.

I work in people's houses, installing internet access through fiber optics, and every now and then I get the geek type of client, and spend most of the time talking about B4X while I work...
The guy I installed the 800MBs access last week is an anaesthetist doctor, interested in knowing how things he uses work, so he decided to create his own site, learning Java and php... And then I introduced him to b4x, and showed him my cube thread...
He was amazed with how simple the code looked and made him think that arduino may be the simplest way to start learning electronic, which he also fancys

Hi,
Yes Robert, you said what I ever wanted to say about B4R, but to be honest what I really don't like much is, 'wrapping libraries'. In near future, I wish to see an easier technique to include C libraries into code, specially for developers who are not familiar with C programming like me