No anchors is just not possible... Why?
Because any view is placed relative to a 0 (zero) point, usually set by the views parent. A view with no anchors would have to have a meaningless left and top values... Which is... Impossible!
Default anchors are top and left, because it's where the parents zero points are!
It exists and it is useful in the case I linked. Try to obtain the layout I published there without a designer's script.
It does not means that the View will stay anchored to the nearest boundary (which should mean mantaining a fixed distance from); the View will be placed at a proportional distance from all boundaries (edges?).
I don't understand.
What do you expect with anchor none?
How should the view be positioned?
You have LEFT, RIGHT and BOTH what is NONE supposd to do different from LEFT?
Please, try to realize the layout as I did (at that time) using VS AND AS I POSTED THERE:
The three central buttons have anchor set to None, so they remain at center even if you change the form size.
Again, NONE means nothing.
In your case you should ask for anchor CENTER that's what you ask in your example..
Then how should Button5 and Button6 be placed?
With a distance to the CENTER or %x to the center?
Distance of Left, Middle or right to the center?
That's why I say that NONE means nothing.
Anchors are simple and useful. They are not supposed to solve all problems. This is exactly why there is also a built-in designer script engine. You can easily implement such a layout with the designer script.
You can also set the minimum width and height with the designer script: