The very useful Find All References (F7) feature has a limitation where it will not find more complex references.
It becomes more acute with B4XPages where most of the code goes into classes.
This limitation will soon be gone as I have rewritten this feature from scratch:
= rewritten
Your English has improved a lot since we first corresponded way back in 2007 in but your past participles are still suspect on occasion.
But don't worry about it, it's the hardest thing for young kids to learn when they start talking as there are lots of irregular ones. Their early attempts at grasping the rules can be quite amusing at times.
That's correct ? But for some reason it's 'I have rewritten'. Don't ask me why, I only speak the language but don't claim to have an understanding of the grammar
One, among many references: list of English irregular verbs.
We used to memorize them all when in school. My favourite ones were the repetitive ones (cost,cut,let..)
It all makes sense to me.
I was raised in the maritimes, Nova Scotia. One must learn to read between the lines...
Now living at the other end of the country, British Columbia - no one understands me...
The only important thing is - "you can always tell a man by the cut of his jib"... want ever the heck that means...
Merry Xmas my good buddies.... I have a deep admiration of you all.
More fun with English...
Adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-color-origin-material-purpose Noun. So you can have a lovely little old rectangular green French silver whittling knife. But if you mess with that word order in the slightest you’ll sound like a maniac. It’s an odd thing that every English speaker uses that list, but almost none of us could write it out.
= rewritten
Your English has improved a lot since we first corresponded way back in 2007 in but your past participles are still suspect on occasion.
But don't worry about it, it's the hardest thing for young kids to learn when they start talking as there are lots of irregular ones. Their early attempts at grasping the rules can be quite amusing at times.
Binary looks a bit too verbose to me
..and for those ready to reply that binary is not a language but an encoding, for which we should agree on an underlying character set (and a language) anyway:
0101100101100101011100110111100101101111011101010110000101110010011001010111001001101001011001110110100001110100