B4R Question Is it possible to optimize the execution efficiency of B4R?

[santook]

Is it possible for B4R to translate Basic syntax directly through XML tags to C/C++ without the need to use the B4R class transfer?.
Otherwise, a C/C++ library needs to first write a call library for the B4R class, so that efficiency will be reduced by half.
Take C/C++ for example

While (1)
{
    digitalWrite (2, HIGH);
    digitalWrite (2, LOW);
}

IO flip rate can reach 144KHz
But B4R

Do while (true)
    Led.digitalWrite (not (led.digitalRead))
Loop

Can only reach 64KHz

 

[Erel]

The overhead added should be very very small.

The B4R code you tested is different than the C++ code.
You need to test it with:

Do while true
 Led.DigitalWrite(True)
 Led.DigitalWrite(False)
Loop