Hello,
i was in the belief, that CF 3.5 can replace CF 2.0 and it is downward/backward compatible to the CF 2.0.When i installed CF 3.5 on my PocketPC 2003, my CF 2.0 requiring App does still complain about the missing CF 2.0.Although my App does not require CF 3.5 , i'm wondering about this.
Is it because the Basic4PPC compiled app does look for the CF 2.0 explicitly or does the CF 3.5 really not support apps written for CF 2.0...?
cheers
TWELVE
i was in the belief, that CF 3.5 can replace CF 2.0 and it is downward/backward compatible to the CF 2.0.When i installed CF 3.5 on my PocketPC 2003, my CF 2.0 requiring App does still complain about the missing CF 2.0.Although my App does not require CF 3.5 , i'm wondering about this.
Is it because the Basic4PPC compiled app does look for the CF 2.0 explicitly or does the CF 3.5 really not support apps written for CF 2.0...?
cheers
TWELVE
