This is not a request for help with an issue, just a solicitation for thoughts. I've been a VB for a long time, and I've pretty much always designed forms with hard-coded controls. All of the B4A programming I've done to date, I've done the same way with the designer and abstract designer. So many of the code samples I see here, particularly from the high-level people, most views are added dynamically at run-time. Why is that approach so commonplace, and am I missing out on something by not following (learning) to write programs in a similar manner.
-
Welcome to B4X forum!
B4X is a set of simple and powerful cross platform RAD tools:
- B4A (free) - Android development
- B4J (free) - Desktop and Server development
- B4i - iOS development
- B4R (free) - Arduino, ESP8266 and ESP32 development
Programming Techniques
- Thread starter Bill Norris
- Start date
- Similar Threads Similar Threads
One reason is that you can make your controls / views dynamic is size, making it fit any screen size (using %x and %y). Designing by hardcode as you mentioned would require you to create many layout files, and yet you could miss some new layout format that show up.
Just my $0.02...
Just my $0.02...
Upvote
0
There is a good chance that the next version will include a new feature named Visual Designer Scripts. It should help you enjoy the visual designer features without losing (almost) any flexibility.
A bit similar to the manifest editor, though it will be more sophisticated.
A bit similar to the manifest editor, though it will be more sophisticated.
Upvote
0
It depends on the app. One with relatively views (or at least few different types of views, such as a few arrays) can create them on the fly in code, but for those with many dozens of different views in complex layouts, it would be almost impossible to create them on the fly.
In such complex apps, I create the layouts in Designer and then fine-tune the layouts in code to make them fit any screen size, as explained on this Wiki page.
Upvote
0