I would like to know if, among the many pending "wishes", there are also "important" things that can improve enough b4a and make it even more "desirable".
Ah OK. Anywhere is lucky so to have a captive client for 10 years from now... Feel free yo post in the right section (it's free and does not cost). So we could bet on the availabilities
I would like to know if, among the many pending "wishes", there are also "important" things that can improve enough b4a and make it even more "desirable".
This is a very important feature. The "implicit" autocomplete is a great feature and this improvements makes it significantly better.
As a general rule it is a mistake and also meaningless to compare a new implemented feature to an unrelated feature request.
The IDE knows where the cursor is and only allow commands which are allowed at this line of code. (Scope?)
In the sample it does not allow a definition of a private variable. Only Private Sub is available at this point so the ide only suggests PrivateSub in the contextmenu....
In the sample it does not allow a definition of a private variable. Only Private Sub is available at this point so the ide only suggests PrivateSub in the contextmenu....
You are correct that the IDE could have limited the choices in this case based on the context. However this feature is a bit different. It is based on the recent choices the developer made.
Is there any way to turn this off? Ever since B4J V5.82 came out, it's frequently wrong in choosing. It makes for very frustrating coding. The way auto-complete worked before worked quite well.
Currently it is not possible to disable it. However it is improved in the next version. You can test it in the beta version: www.b4x.com/b4j/files/beta.exe