Wish SLC should use the new Folderstructure

DonManfred

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
B4J and B4A now supports the new Folderstructure for Libraries.

I wish SLC (B4A) would use the path
E:\B4X.Additionallibs\B4A\ directly when the Path to the Additionallibs in B4A is set to E:\B4X.Additionallibs\ and the Folder B4A exists here.

I wish SLC (B4J) would use the path
E:\B4X.Additionallibs\B4J\ directly when the Path to the Additionallibs in B4J is set to E:\B4X.Additionallibs\ and the Folder B4J exists here.
 

DonManfred

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
Can it be that SLC, when working using Commandline, now does not write a jar or xml. I see the commandwindow open and i guess it compiles fine but i am missing the jar and xml.
I´m investigating...

For now i am getting


but the jar and xml files are not written.
 

DonManfred

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
Hidden hint

The B4A SLC is working as Expected. Just wanted to post the log

 

DonManfred

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
The B4J SLC is not working for me.
sorry, i must say that it seems that the b4j is not working at all. At least for me.

When i run the B4A SLC from Eclipse
i get the Log captured in the Eclipsewindow. (This was the case in the old SLC and SLC4J too)


When i run the SLC for B4J then the Windows Command window pop up, i see the output in the commandwindow and after the commandwindow disappear nothing happen.
Even the Console in Eclipse does not popup with the result.

Could you please recheck that B4J_LibraryCompiler.exe is effectively creating the Files for you? Meaning: delete the old jar and xml and let SLC create them new.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…