Wish Slightly misleading description for MgsboxAsync.

[Gavin]

One of the lines in the Tool Tips Box for a MsgboxAsync is, in my opinion, a little misleading.
It States:-
You can use Wait For to wait for the Msgbox_Result even if you want to continue the code flow after the dialog is dismissed.
The word "even" is, IMHO, misleading in this context.
I believe the line should read:-
You can use Wait For, to wait for the Msgbox_Result, if you want to continue the code flow after the dialog is dismissed.
Or
You can use Wait For, to wait for the Msgbox_Result, if you want to continue the code flow "only" after the dialog is dismissed.

This way, there is no confusion.
From what I can see, using Wait For, makes the Non-Modal dialog behave as though it was a Modal dialog.

Just my thoughts

Gavin

 

[Erel]

It is "event" not "even".

You can use Wait For to wait for the Msgbox_Result event if you want to continue the code flow after the dialog is dismissed.

 

[Gavin]

My apologies Erel, you are correct.
It it the lack of a comma after the word "event", which caused me to miss read.

Gavin