Slip-up or deliberate, Rect in Debug display?

E

enonod

Well-Known Member

Licensed User

Longtime User

• Jan 11, 2012

• #1

When debugging Rect displays as follows...

RectA (Rect) Rect(10, 16 - 16, 22)

I was trying to figure how I could get negative numbers.
Should it be...

RectA (Rect) Rect(10, 16, 16, 22)

or is it a deliberate separation of the two halves? If so may I recommend a colon ) instead.

 

Erel

B4X founder

Staff member

Licensed User

Longtime User

• Jan 11, 2012

• #2

This is the default ToString() implementation of Rect. While it can be overridden I think that it is reasonable.

 

klaus

Expert

Licensed User

Longtime User

• Jan 11, 2012

• #3

+ 1,
me too I spend once quite some time to find out why I had a negative width till I found that it was the display.

Best regards.

 

Erel

B4X founder

Staff member

Licensed User

Longtime User

• Jan 11, 2012

• #4

Fixed for v1.8.