S sorex Expert Licensed User Longtime User Jan 13, 2016 #1 Hello, Today I noticed something strange and I thought I must have hit a key combo to expand all subs. A moment ago I had it again and figure out where it goes wrong. when you add a new sub in front / above collapsed subs everything below it loses their collapse status and get expended.
Hello, Today I noticed something strange and I thought I must have hit a key combo to expand all subs. A moment ago I had it again and figure out where it goes wrong. when you add a new sub in front / above collapsed subs everything below it loses their collapse status and get expended.
S sorex Expert Licensed User Longtime User Jan 13, 2016 #2 this was originally in 5.20 but it happends in 5.50 aswell. (just upgraded to 5.50)
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jan 14, 2016 #3 At some point the page structure is invalid (when there is no sub name), the following subs are now invalid as well as the parser cannot parse them. So the collapse state is lost.
At some point the page structure is invalid (when there is no sub name), the following subs are now invalid as well as the parser cannot parse them. So the collapse state is lost.
S sorex Expert Licensed User Longtime User Jan 14, 2016 #4 I see but that spoils the fun when scrolling between 2 sub between the collapsed stuff as I need to reclose everything again that expanded. ModuleClosedNodes0 is based on the sub count. Maybe it's better to use the subnames instead to ignore wrong counting and only update it when a +/- is clicked? ModuleClosedNodes0=Activity_Resume,Activity_Pause
I see but that spoils the fun when scrolling between 2 sub between the collapsed stuff as I need to reclose everything again that expanded. ModuleClosedNodes0 is based on the sub count. Maybe it's better to use the subnames instead to ignore wrong counting and only update it when a +/- is clicked? ModuleClosedNodes0=Activity_Resume,Activity_Pause
Erel B4X founder Staff member Licensed User Longtime User Jan 14, 2016 #5 sorex said: ModuleClosedNodes0 is based on the sub count. Maybe it's better to use the subnames instead to ignore wrong counting and only update it when a +/- is clicked? ModuleClosedNodes0=Activity_Resume,Activity_Pause Click to expand... It is not related.
sorex said: ModuleClosedNodes0 is based on the sub count. Maybe it's better to use the subnames instead to ignore wrong counting and only update it when a +/- is clicked? ModuleClosedNodes0=Activity_Resume,Activity_Pause Click to expand... It is not related.