10. Debugger
* When you look at the properties of a view, you see a shitload of properties, but usually not the ones you actually use in code. Could the "internal" properties be hidden away in a sub level of the tree, and could all the "external" ones be shown with their usual names?
* An easy way to filter log to only show the entries coming from my Log() (and LogColor(), of course) statements in code, and hide everything else. I usually only resort to Log() in two cases, to see the order of events and to debug really complex code. When I debug really complex code, I want it to be as clean as possible, with only my stuff in the log. Occasionally (though, not yet, in B4A), I've had to resort to writing programs to analyse log output to check complex calculations, and then I really don't want unexpected entries.
This was the last part. Don't get me wrong, I love B4A, I just want to help to make it even better.
Sorry if I misunderstood something and posted wishes that are already implemented. In that case, take it as a confirmation that I approve.
Also, sorry for spamming!
* When you look at the properties of a view, you see a shitload of properties, but usually not the ones you actually use in code. Could the "internal" properties be hidden away in a sub level of the tree, and could all the "external" ones be shown with their usual names?
* An easy way to filter log to only show the entries coming from my Log() (and LogColor(), of course) statements in code, and hide everything else. I usually only resort to Log() in two cases, to see the order of events and to debug really complex code. When I debug really complex code, I want it to be as clean as possible, with only my stuff in the log. Occasionally (though, not yet, in B4A), I've had to resort to writing programs to analyse log output to check complex calculations, and then I really don't want unexpected entries.
This was the last part. Don't get me wrong, I love B4A, I just want to help to make it even better.
Sorry if I misunderstood something and posted wishes that are already implemented. In that case, take it as a confirmation that I approve.
Also, sorry for spamming!
Last edited: