I've got a type definition in a cross-platform project:
Works like a charm in B4A and B4J, but when I use B4i I get a compaint about "description is not a valid identifier". Sounds strange, but I confirmed that if I rename it to something less fitting for my scenario, the type is indeed accepted.
Is this the expected behaviour?
(It feels like it might be a bug, because why would "description" be off-limits? And if so, what other identifiers are verboten?)
B4X:
Type typeSomething( _
classname As String, _
displayname As String, _
description As String, _
)Works like a charm in B4A and B4J, but when I use B4i I get a compaint about "description is not a valid identifier". Sounds strange, but I confirmed that if I rename it to something less fitting for my scenario, the type is indeed accepted.
Is this the expected behaviour?
(It feels like it might be a bug, because why would "description" be off-limits? And if so, what other identifiers are verboten?)