? erel's ultimate definitive answer

[rabbitBUSH]

@Erel's getting Really efficient.....

 

[LucaMs]

???

 

[emexes]

@Erel's getting Really efficient.....

I thought "?" would be even more efficient but then I realised that it would actually be one byte longer (one 4-byte UTF-8 character vs three 1-byte characters).

 

[rabbitBUSH]

I thought "?" would be even more efficient but then I realised that it would actually be one byte longer (one 4-byte UTF-8 character vs three 1-byte characters).

evidently - his BIG mistake was the full-stop at the end - then - the definitive two byte answer. Or just N one byte (But the explanation would be HUGE = Y/N)

 

[emexes]

evidently - his BIG mistake was the full-stop at the end

Lol I thought the full-stop was masterly - indicates the discussion is finished and heads off additional discussion at the pass, thus lowering probability of having to add anything further.

One extra character saves many.

 

[rabbitBUSH]

the full-stop was masterly

So - - - #1 was absolutely correct in its own definitiveness.... relating to the definitiveness of the esteemed Alpha.

Ahhhhh I crack me up some days.... ?

 

[MrKim]

"No." Is a complete sentence. That is one of the most valuable lessons I have learned in life. I don't owe anyone an explanation.