Search Results

This is expected. Silent pushes do not work, if app is not running (killed by user). IMO, much easy to communicate with own web server and to receive commands from it in 'real' time (without delays).
link: I missed the fact that you are talking about silent push notifications. Silent push notification do work if implemented properly. However they are not
link: Hi, i'm trying to use Firebase to send Silent Push Notifications to my app. The app, then, choose to show a notificaiton with LocalNotification or not
link: I'm using the library pyFCM to use it in a python script (it works 100% of the time on android), i also tried to use a custom function made in python

See this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44796613/silent-pushes-not-delivered-to-the-app-on-ios-11 Silent push notifications are not very reliable on iOS 11.
link: Hi Erel, I believe that "Message Arrived" should be displayed on iReleaseLogger if the Silent Push is processed, Isn't that the expected behavior? P
link: Silent push messages will not work if the user force-killed your app. The same is true for background fetching. Regular messages will work. However y
link: Hi Erel Thanks for your reply. My goal is to be able to invoke functions, such us downloading and playing audio files after the application is killed

Not really. There is a feature called silent push notifications that causes your app to start when a notification arrives: https://www.b4x.com/search?query=b4i+silent+push however they have a very low priority and many will be missed.

There are the silent push notifications. These bring in the front for a while the app to execute some tasks. https://www.b4x.-push-notifications.56016/
link: Well, this open the door to another issue: when you are not using your device (screen black, device is on the table) after some time it enters in a so
link: It's a lost battle ... a good app should always work and stop. Standard notifications always arrive. Silent notifications it depends. Not good.
link: Maybe you can check if it is activated from your backend (maybe send a silent notification and wait for an mqtt report "I am ready" in your backend an

I haven't tested it with the latest version of iOS, however I would guess that they are still unreliable as they are unreliable by Apple design. Try it. It isn't too difficult to implement. You can also combine it with the background fetch solution.
link: Looking to old threads, it has been said that Silent push notifications are unreliable while standard notifications always work. Is this still true ?

This occurs once a day and cannot be changed by user or developer action. This throttle is disabled if the app is run from Xcode, so be sure to test your app by running it from the device to have the same user experience your customers will have. All of this points out that the intent is that a not
link: The same software instaled in Iphone 4S and Iphone 6 when the apk is in background and I send a Silent Push to each one the Iphone 4S receive and Ipho
link: I succeed in receive a Silent Push Notification for a day using this. In server ( in my case PHP ) I setup " 'content_available' => false " In B4I p
link: Wow, that's a trick, but you now only use FCM-Push in your app and no apn. If the device is not reachable or the app is in background, fcm sends the p

It seems not to be possible to make sure, that the app reads the content-data after an silent push arrives. After testing it with more than 100 users, the determin, that starting the app in not energy-efficient, happens very often. As Erel told in many threads berfore, that it is not possible to rel
link: I'm realy sure, that the mistake is in my code, but your experiences shows me, that silent push in not so simple to do as it seems to be...
link: We are talking about silent notifications here. They behave different than standard notifications. The process will be started automatically if it is
link: 1. See this thread: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26959472/silent-push-notifications-only-delivered-if-device-is-charging-and-or-app-is-for 2. Y

The event will be raised when a message arrives while the app is in the foreground. If the app is not in the foreground then a standard alert message will appear. The user can click on the message to start the app. The event will be fired after the app has started. Private Sub (Message As Map,
link: Before I create the certifieds, I delete all logs, and the recreate when push, look in attachment. I dont see where I´m doing wrong I try with sandbo
link: I would like when such a app is running and is on Foreground, the push message have to same behaviour than if the app is in background. Is that possib
link: Hi, I did manage to run the push b4i and generate the token Would you please insert PHP code for the server? I want to echo to my device from my

I would create a table in the db and place in it all the filenames (one in each record) and an indicator Uploaded (field) next to each. Then with silent push notifications I would create code that for each next silent push notification it will try to upload the next not uploaded file in the table an
link: Try to search in the forum the tutorial for Silent Push Notifications. You can also split the job - that is post partly the bytes in server 1 and host
link: That is, if I use silent push notifications, will it make the application work in the background? There are several problems here: - I don't have acce

Hi, As I understood from previous posts silent push notifications can execute some code for 30 seconds after having received a silent notification. This is only true as long as the app has not been closed by the user, which might be a problem. I understood that meanwhile there is a way for a silen
link: Indeed, Pushkit VoIP notifications are the only ones that can raise your app in any situation (even if swipe-killed), but can't be used for other purp
link: thanks, But it seems there still is no support for PushKit VoiIP in B4i ?

Powered by ColBERT