Everyone will soon have their own server at home

Troberg

Well-Known Member
Licensed User
Longtime User
virtualize them onto a decent sever with vmware ;)

I need more CPU power, than what's feasible with that solution. Also, there's a limit to how many disks I can stick into one server. Another important reason is to not have a massive "kill-all single point of failure".
 

sorex

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
it all depends on how expensive you want to go.

you can use 2 vmware servers and put the data on a san/nas.

if a server goes down it will start the virtual machines that were running on the dead one on the other one.

but then again, you still have a single point of failure, the san. so you need 2 who do live sync.

a bit of overkill for a home solution ;)
 

LucaMs

Expert
Licensed User
Longtime User
I changed my ISP: now it is WIND INFOSTRADA.

View attachment 37000

The contract sets up to 20Mpbs. Same as the contract with my previous ISP but before I obtained 16Mpbs - 0.89Mbps.
I protested for over a month and they promised each time to increase the speed by saying that my line could easily reach 24Mpbs!

Thank you WIND INFOSTRADA.
(this is just my first advertising for your very bad service. The next will have a much wider audience, be sure).


I "found" a smart operator in Infostrada (1/7 is a good number :p)

From:
upload_2015-8-30_7-30-54-png.37000


To:
upload_2015-9-10_20-28-34.png
 
Top