Maybe, but I don't like what I'm already using... I need to acheive better performance with large result sets. Does SQLite-jdbc-Connector add overhead like garbage collection to what I could get from sqlite3.dll?
I don't want to use jDBC or any other superstructure, just the rawest form of SQLite. I'm totally at home with the SQlite C API, and have been writing SQL queries for decades. I just need to get the optimum performance out of SQLite with the minimum overhead. I will never need to port my code to another DB.
B4J comes with xerial (https://bitbucket.org/xerial/sqlite-jdbc) which use the native SQlite libraries for different OSes , and no manual configurations needed.
What is different from Zentus's SQLite JDBC?
The current sqlite-jdbc implementation is based on the code of Zentus's SQLite JDBC driver (missing link). We have improved it in two ways:
Support major operating systems by embedding native libraries of SQLite, compiled for each of them.