Hi there!
A few years ago, at the early days of AI, I had a wish for @Erel — to create an assistant integrated into the B4X IDE, something similar to the old Microsoft assistant. I wanted a lovable, interactive helper at the top of the IDE — like the classic animated cursor characters that appeared in earlier software. Interestingly, products like that actually appeared about two years later.
Over those two years, programming itself has become more streamlined, while imagination, design, and conceptual thinking have taken the lead. Of course, if you’re not a developer and don’t know how to debug or fix errors, working with AI can quickly become frustrating or unproductive.
I believe now is the time to take B4X to the next level by developing an in-house assistant — even as a paid feature. After all, why pay ChatGPT or Claude $20 per month when we could instead support Anywhere Software?
@Erel , or perhaps a larger B4X team, could define the framework and rules. This way, debugging and compiling could become faster and smoother, eliminating the need to copy and paste code from other assistants — and minimizing syntax errors altogether.
ps: look lovable.app, look cursor, look ai gemini studio... but all these creating typescript -> react... But we have the opportunity to return B4X code, having rules from the best... at his IDE - or a new IDE...
fantasy design - hmmm may be the following can be web app too... (what is easier)
----
But if Erel don't want for his personal reasons do something... i have some questions...
- is there a cmd compiler of b4j, b4a, b4i... also can be used also for debug/release versions..
- is there someway a lib checking for b4j - b4a - b4i syntax if it is right ? - perhaps through python is easier ?
A few years ago, at the early days of AI, I had a wish for @Erel — to create an assistant integrated into the B4X IDE, something similar to the old Microsoft assistant. I wanted a lovable, interactive helper at the top of the IDE — like the classic animated cursor characters that appeared in earlier software. Interestingly, products like that actually appeared about two years later.
Over those two years, programming itself has become more streamlined, while imagination, design, and conceptual thinking have taken the lead. Of course, if you’re not a developer and don’t know how to debug or fix errors, working with AI can quickly become frustrating or unproductive.
I believe now is the time to take B4X to the next level by developing an in-house assistant — even as a paid feature. After all, why pay ChatGPT or Claude $20 per month when we could instead support Anywhere Software?
@Erel , or perhaps a larger B4X team, could define the framework and rules. This way, debugging and compiling could become faster and smoother, eliminating the need to copy and paste code from other assistants — and minimizing syntax errors altogether.
ps: look lovable.app, look cursor, look ai gemini studio... but all these creating typescript -> react... But we have the opportunity to return B4X code, having rules from the best... at his IDE - or a new IDE...
fantasy design - hmmm may be the following can be web app too... (what is easier)
----
But if Erel don't want for his personal reasons do something... i have some questions...
- is there a cmd compiler of b4j, b4a, b4i... also can be used also for debug/release versions..
- is there someway a lib checking for b4j - b4a - b4i syntax if it is right ? - perhaps through python is easier ?